Thom Yorke slags Glastonbury for not being green enough
Finally! Even though I get sick to my teeth, sick in my teeth and all over someone else’s teeth at rock stars preaching about [insert good cause here], I’m rather glad that Thom Yorke (he’s in Radiohead, y’know?) has spoken up about Glastonbury and its clearly un-green ways.
Yorke’s revealed that Radiohead didn
Oh pish and bollocks. This really was the wrong day for Anna to point out this blog to me….
First: “It’s difficult to get to, which means you HAVE to drive”
Except for the past 20 years the festival has provided free buses from Castle Carry train station for all festival goes.
And runs shuttle buses from Bath and Bristol.
And First Great Western and Wessex Trains run extra trains from London, Reading and Swindon to Castle Carry.
And last year 20% of tickets (22,500) were sold as coach only tickets.
And National Express run additional coach services direct to the site from all around the country.
There’s far more options for getting to Glastonbury by public transport than any other festival. If Thom York has to bring a helicoptor on site because he can’t catch the bus that’s his problem.
And if Thom wants to lessen the impact of his shows on the environment, how about a 20 date tour of smaller theatre venues, rather than 2 dates in massive arenas where people have to travel half the country to go and see them. But of course, that’s a solution that might actually inconvenice him, and doesn’t just amount to throwing money and the problem and telling the fans to catch the train to thier gigs.
Does Glasto use a lot of electric? Sure. But no more proportionally than any other festival, and a bunch is no-doubt cancelled out by having 150,000 people not using any electric themselves that they would use at home.
I’m something of a cynic and I don’t buy the ‘Glasto is all hippy fun’ line. Plenty of people are making a lot of money of it, and I don’t agree with some of the causes they support (Greenpeace, for one) but in this particular instance York is talking bollocks.
He’s right about one thing though. I am sick of the sight of him.
“Does Glasto use a lot of electric? Sure. But no more proportionally than any other festival, and a bunch is no-doubt cancelled out by having 150,000 people not using any electric themselves that they would use at home.”
I think the problem with that fact, though it’s sound and probably true, is that many frequenters of Glasto go on about it as though it is some sort of utopia where the environment is only enriched by their all-knowing goodness towards the world. If more Glasto champions were truthful and said that they just plain enjoyed the experience, people would be softer on them.
The problem is the arguement reductio ad absurdum. Yes, not having Glastonbury would be better for the environment than having Glastonbury. But that applies to everything. Radiohead not touring at all would be better than them touring however many precautions they take. Not having a computer to post this on would be better for the environment than having one… Unless we walk everywhere and live in a house with no electricity and no modern amenities everything we do is going to have a degree of impact on the environment.
So if we accept we’re going to have a Glastonbury because it’s fun (and profitable), Glastonbury Festival Limited go out of thier way to say “how can we make this as environmentally sound as possible?” something that has never concerned, for example the V Festival. Where Radiohead played in 2006.
Of course, this story originated in The Sun, so I’m not sure how much of what York said was taken out of context etc, but it’s frustrating seeing the whole story repeated over the internet without people checking the facts.
Unless, y’know, it puts people off going to Glasto and makes it easier to get tickets in April…